Comments on: “How Shall We Call [Web 3.0] Instead, Mike? Please Indulge Us” http://www.mkbergman.com/462/how-shall-we-call-web-30-instead-mike-please-indulge-us/ Mike Bergman on the semantic Web and structured Web Wed, 01 Feb 2012 21:05:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Mike http://www.mkbergman.com/462/how-shall-we-call-web-30-instead-mike-please-indulge-us/comment-page-1/#comment-49856 Mike Mon, 20 Oct 2008 04:08:02 +0000 http://www.mkbergman.com/?p=462#comment-49856 Thanks, Dan, I appreciate the response. It will be interesting to see what unfolds over the coming months and years. While I know there are grounds for a "debate" here, I'll be pleased to see how others may take up the discussion (or not). Regards, Mike Thanks, Dan, I appreciate the response.

It will be interesting to see what unfolds over the coming months and years.

While I know there are grounds for a “debate” here, I’ll be pleased to see how others may take up the discussion (or not).

Regards, Mike

]]> By: Dan Grigorovici http://www.mkbergman.com/462/how-shall-we-call-web-30-instead-mike-please-indulge-us/comment-page-1/#comment-49855 Dan Grigorovici Mon, 20 Oct 2008 02:34:05 +0000 http://www.mkbergman.com/?p=462#comment-49855 Mike, thanks for the clarification. I also count you as a colleague and friend, even though colleagues and friends are ok agreeing on some ideas, disagreeing on others. Just wanted to assure you that we are not having a flame war, but a constructive debate that hopefully will get whichever term will come as ultimately successful in defining our work, cleaner, better, stronger. See my latest blog post on www.web3beat.com where I explain my position. Once again, I did not take it as a flame war, nor should you. There is nothing constructive with conformity of ideas; only debates bring the best arguments forth. Mike, thanks for the clarification. I also count you as a colleague and friend, even though colleagues and friends are ok agreeing on some ideas, disagreeing on others. Just wanted to assure you that we are not having a flame war, but a constructive debate that hopefully will get whichever term will come as ultimately successful in defining our work, cleaner, better, stronger. See my latest blog post on http://www.web3beat.com where I explain my position. Once again, I did not take it as a flame war, nor should you. There is nothing constructive with conformity of ideas; only debates bring the best arguments forth.

]]> By: Web3Beat http://www.mkbergman.com/462/how-shall-we-call-web-30-instead-mike-please-indulge-us/comment-page-1/#comment-49854 Web3Beat Mon, 20 Oct 2008 02:17:59 +0000 http://www.mkbergman.com/?p=462#comment-49854 <strong>A Response to Anti-Web 3.0 proponents, and an explanation why Web 3.0 is better than others...</strong> Mike Bergman has responded to my rather visceral reaction to his visceral reaction ("squash the "web 3.0" cockroach" - see my original post here: Web 3.0, (semantic) advertising, and why Semantic Web can't get their %&$^ together. This is my..... A Response to Anti-Web 3.0 proponents, and an explanation why Web 3.0 is better than others…

Mike Bergman has responded to my rather visceral reaction to his visceral reaction (“squash the “web 3.0″ cockroach” – see my original post here: Web 3.0, (semantic) advertising, and why Semantic Web can’t get their %&$^ together. This is my…..

]]>