<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Intrepid Guide to Ontologies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mkbergman.com/374/an-intrepid-guide-to-ontologies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mkbergman.com/374/an-intrepid-guide-to-ontologies/</link>
	<description>Mike Bergman on the semantic Web and structured Web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:03:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John From Berkeley &#187; links for 2007-07-28</title>
		<link>http://www.mkbergman.com/374/an-intrepid-guide-to-ontologies/comment-page-1/#comment-45831</link>
		<dc:creator>John From Berkeley &#187; links for 2007-07-28</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 00:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mkbergman.com/?p=374#comment-45831</guid>
		<description>[...] An Intrepid Guide to Ontologies  Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â» AI3:::Adaptive Information (tags: ontology toread tutorials) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An Intrepid Guide to Ontologies  Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â» AI3:::Adaptive Information (tags: ontology toread tutorials) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2007-07-24 - .:&#124;randgaenge&#124;:.</title>
		<link>http://www.mkbergman.com/374/an-intrepid-guide-to-ontologies/comment-page-1/#comment-45743</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2007-07-24 - .:&#124;randgaenge&#124;:.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 08:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mkbergman.com/?p=374#comment-45743</guid>
		<description>[...] An Intrepid Guide to Ontologies (tags: knowledge metadata ontology rdf) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An Intrepid Guide to Ontologies (tags: knowledge metadata ontology rdf) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.mkbergman.com/374/an-intrepid-guide-to-ontologies/comment-page-1/#comment-45404</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mkbergman.com/?p=374#comment-45404</guid>
		<description>@Bob,

Thank you for your very gracious comments.  I am very impressed with the Ontolog Tax-Thesaurus project and look forward to helping in whatever way I can.

As for my next blog topics, I plan to continue with some on ontology, but then very much focused on the importance of structure and structure extraction.  It is in this regard that the Ontolog efforts are of such interest.

Let&#039;s do chat offline!

@Liam,

This is not an academic publication, just my attempts as a past academic to masquerade as such.  These ontology pieces are related to an initiative called UMBEL that will be publicly released in the next week or two.  Per my earlier comments, I recommend you look into the Ontolog community-of-practice (COP).  That is where the real ontology experts hang out.  I was merely acting as a sort of journalist on the topic.

Thanks, Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bob,</p>
<p>Thank you for your very gracious comments.  I am very impressed with the Ontolog Tax-Thesaurus project and look forward to helping in whatever way I can.</p>
<p>As for my next blog topics, I plan to continue with some on ontology, but then very much focused on the importance of structure and structure extraction.  It is in this regard that the Ontolog efforts are of such interest.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s do chat offline!</p>
<p>@Liam,</p>
<p>This is not an academic publication, just my attempts as a past academic to masquerade as such.  These ontology pieces are related to an initiative called UMBEL that will be publicly released in the next week or two.  Per my earlier comments, I recommend you look into the Ontolog community-of-practice (COP).  That is where the real ontology experts hang out.  I was merely acting as a sort of journalist on the topic.</p>
<p>Thanks, Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam Magee</title>
		<link>http://www.mkbergman.com/374/an-intrepid-guide-to-ontologies/comment-page-1/#comment-45401</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam Magee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 02:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mkbergman.com/?p=374#comment-45401</guid>
		<description>This is the best survey of ontology formalisms I&#039;ve come across. Is this an academic publication at this stage, or is it intended to be? Also I&#039;m curious about how you think about &#039;world-views&#039;? How &#039;ontological&#039; would you take different world-views to be (strong cognitive dissonances, or weak perspectival differences)? Apologies if that issue is somewhat off-topic - I am interested particularly in how upper or mid-level ontologies might be &#039;bridgeable&#039; in some sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the best survey of ontology formalisms I&#8217;ve come across. Is this an academic publication at this stage, or is it intended to be? Also I&#8217;m curious about how you think about &#8216;world-views&#8217;? How &#8216;ontological&#8217; would you take different world-views to be (strong cognitive dissonances, or weak perspectival differences)? Apologies if that issue is somewhat off-topic &#8211; I am interested particularly in how upper or mid-level ontologies might be &#8216;bridgeable&#8217; in some sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.mkbergman.com/374/an-intrepid-guide-to-ontologies/comment-page-1/#comment-45400</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 16:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mkbergman.com/?p=374#comment-45400</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael,

Thanks for the insightful discussions of the Ontology Summit and the broader context. Denise Bedford, Peter Yim, Ken Baclawski and others who attended the Summit are involved with an Ontolog Project we call the Taxo-Thesaurus Project. We are meeting this morning at the website identified above to take some practical next steps. Your &quot;Intrepid Guide&quot; was on my Agenda as &quot;must reading&quot;.

On my own separate agenda as a member of a large city&#039;s Environmental Board concerned with energy, water, food, and security infrastructures, I plan on inserting your Intrepid Guide webpage into several other local decision points involving large infrastructure planning (AES, Poseidon, Regional Water Quality Control Boards, etc.), but it would be especially useful to make pragmatic linkages between Architectural, Engineering and Construction domains and regulatory domains.

Given your long history of involvement with US Infrastructure and its evolution to today&#039;s disastrous state (for example Steve Flynn&#039;s recent &quot;Edge of Disaster&quot; and Joe Brewer&#039;s re-alignment of Security Semantics from military actions to infrastructure/climate change at http://www.rockridgeinstitute.org/research/rockridge/shifting-the-climate-of-security )

Will you be addressing these messy issues in a future blog????

If so, please let me know (or perhaps we can chat). 

Cheers,

Bob
Tall Tree Labs
Co-Chair, Ontolog Forum Taxo-Thesaurus Project</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael,</p>
<p>Thanks for the insightful discussions of the Ontology Summit and the broader context. Denise Bedford, Peter Yim, Ken Baclawski and others who attended the Summit are involved with an Ontolog Project we call the Taxo-Thesaurus Project. We are meeting this morning at the website identified above to take some practical next steps. Your &#8220;Intrepid Guide&#8221; was on my Agenda as &#8220;must reading&#8221;.</p>
<p>On my own separate agenda as a member of a large city&#8217;s Environmental Board concerned with energy, water, food, and security infrastructures, I plan on inserting your Intrepid Guide webpage into several other local decision points involving large infrastructure planning (AES, Poseidon, Regional Water Quality Control Boards, etc.), but it would be especially useful to make pragmatic linkages between Architectural, Engineering and Construction domains and regulatory domains.</p>
<p>Given your long history of involvement with US Infrastructure and its evolution to today&#8217;s disastrous state (for example Steve Flynn&#8217;s recent &#8220;Edge of Disaster&#8221; and Joe Brewer&#8217;s re-alignment of Security Semantics from military actions to infrastructure/climate change at <a href="http://www.rockridgeinstitute.org/research/rockridge/shifting-the-climate-of-security" rel="nofollow">http://www.rockridgeinstitute.org/research/rockridge/shifting-the-climate-of-security</a> )</p>
<p>Will you be addressing these messy issues in a future blog????</p>
<p>If so, please let me know (or perhaps we can chat). </p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Bob<br />
Tall Tree Labs<br />
Co-Chair, Ontolog Forum Taxo-Thesaurus Project</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where are the Road Signs for the Structured Web? &#187; AI3:::Adaptive Information</title>
		<link>http://www.mkbergman.com/374/an-intrepid-guide-to-ontologies/comment-page-1/#comment-45149</link>
		<dc:creator>Where are the Road Signs for the Structured Web? &#187; AI3:::Adaptive Information</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 22:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mkbergman.com/?p=374#comment-45149</guid>
		<description>[...] As my recent Intrepid Guide to Ontologies pointed out, there are at least 40 different approaches (or types of ontologies, loosely defined) extant on the Web for organizing information. These approaches embrace every conceivable domain and subject. The individual data sets using these approaches span many, many orders of magnitude in size and range of scope. Diversity and chaos we have aplenty, as the illustrative diagram of this jumbled structural mess shows below.  [Click on image for full-size pop-up] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As my recent Intrepid Guide to Ontologies pointed out, there are at least 40 different approaches (or types of ontologies, loosely defined) extant on the Web for organizing information. These approaches embrace every conceivable domain and subject. The individual data sets using these approaches span many, many orders of magnitude in size and range of scope. Diversity and chaos we have aplenty, as the illustrative diagram of this jumbled structural mess shows below.  [Click on image for full-size pop-up] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Identity 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; An Intrepid Guide to Ontologies</title>
		<link>http://www.mkbergman.com/374/an-intrepid-guide-to-ontologies/comment-page-1/#comment-45043</link>
		<dc:creator>Identity 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; An Intrepid Guide to Ontologies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 15:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mkbergman.com/?p=374#comment-45043</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more from the original source: AI3:::Adaptive Information Identity 2.0 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more from the original source: AI3:::Adaptive Information Identity 2.0 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: State of the SIOC-o-sphere (#4) at Cloudlands</title>
		<link>http://www.mkbergman.com/374/an-intrepid-guide-to-ontologies/comment-page-1/#comment-45041</link>
		<dc:creator>State of the SIOC-o-sphere (#4) at Cloudlands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 11:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mkbergman.com/?p=374#comment-45041</guid>
		<description>[...] Mike Bergman has written an interesting post called &#8220;An Intrepid Guide to Ontologies&#8220;. This follows on nicely from his recent &#8220;Eat Your Greens: FOAF and SIOC are Good for You&#8220;. Thanks Mike! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mike Bergman has written an interesting post called &#8220;An Intrepid Guide to Ontologies&#8220;. This follows on nicely from his recent &#8220;Eat Your Greens: FOAF and SIOC are Good for You&#8220;. Thanks Mike! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
